Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Reporting Defense Contractor Fraud and the Law

Information about reporting Defense Contractor Fraud on Blogspot.

Reporting Defense Contractor Fraud: Whistleblower Law

Defense contractor fraud is a major category of litigation, which is no surprise given that in 2011 the US government spent more than 316 billion in defense contracts. Our lawyers are among the most skilled in the country. Your confidentiality is assured, Below the law, a contractor could not discharge, demote, or otherwise discriminate against an employee for engaging in protected fraud reporting activity.

Information on reporting Defense Contractor Fraud

Defense Contractor Fraud claims can be contemplated against any contractor such as: Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Common Dynamics, Raytheon, L-3 Communications, United Technologies, SAIC, KBR, Personal computer Sciences Corp, Honeywell, ITT Corp, FMC Corp, AM General, Navistar International and dozens of other folks.

Perform for Covered agencies contain the Department of Defense, the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, the Coast Guard, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

Here are a couple of:

Violations of the Truth-in-Negotiations Act (TINA)
Cross Charging
Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA) Violations

If the government can not place out competitive bids from a sole-supply supplier, TINA needs the contractor to truthfully disclose all the data about its fees to the government in sole-source contract negotiations. This guarantees the government can pay a fair value for the weapons technique with no compromising national security.

However greed can get in the way of the TINA guidelines and defense contractors in TINA scenarios hold back relevant data, or much more frequently deliberately inflate the projected fees in order to get a considerably higher price tag. If you know about this variety practice at your corporation you can confidentially report it.

Cross Charging Fraud: Mixing Fixed Cost and Expense Plus Contracts

This is a quite widespread sort of fraud in which a defense contractor deliberately blurs the line in between various projects becoming worked on.

Item Substitution/Inferior Grade

This happens when the organization violates the contract by changing the parts that are supposed to be in the product. Defense contractors are required to develop weapons working with selected grade and excellent of component elements which normally must be bought from American businesses. If you are conscious of this you can report it.

Improper Cost Allocation

Frequently the costs fall into a gray location and may well not be effortlessly classified as straight tied to a distinct project. This can consist of overhead, operating costs, supervisors' time, and similar fees. Greedy contractors will try to shift expenses to the government, way from private clients, who will only pay the market price for the aircraft. This price-shifting permits the contractor to quote low costs to their private clients, a enormous competitive benefit leaving taxpayers the government to pay for the losses on value cuts. Contractors in the private/government sphere, in particular aircraft marketplace that deliberately shift overhead and related indirect expenses to the government may well be committing significant scale fraud.

Failure to comply with contract specifications

When military contractor goes over price range on a contract or falls behind schedule,it may possibly cut corners on essential test, top quality, and item specifications. Have information about Defense Contractor Fraud? Report it to to the Defense Contractor Fraud Center.